• Join The Fed
• Advertise with The Fed

• About Us
• Contact

In This Issue

• The Spec's Front Page (PDF)
• Matthew Fox Strips Naked, Insults Graduates
• Krishna vs. Christianity
• Last Book of Potter Pilfered, Rowling "Shocked"
• Secret Society No Longer Secret to Sniffer-Outers of Secrecy
• New York's Preschools Seek Swingset Leaders
• Bitches Got the Right to Shut the Fuck Up
• Before They Were Great Quotations
• An Inconvenient Truth Is Unsafe at Any Speed
• Spectator Copy Editor Shares Typical Evening
• Dancing Tops Crappy American Exports to UK
• Columbia Spectator: Op-Eds (PDF)
• Spec Staff Editorial: What the Fuck, Man
• Spec Sexportations: Delivering Our Children
• Spec PERSPECTIVES: Importance of History
• Spec: Corrections
• Spec: Letters to the Editor
• Prezbo v. Hamiltron
• THEY Watch

The review of C.M.T.S.’s new musical, Birds of Fury Zombies, (Mar. 27) featured opinion based on The Hills Have Eyes 2 rather than the actual theatrical performance.

The editorial entitled “Meat Sandwiches for You” (Mar. 28) was not the opinion of the Editorial Board, but instead that of an overzealous assistant copy editor with a cannabinoid-induced appetite.

The opinion column “Neuro? Why Not?: Kittens Are Pretty” (Mar. 25) misidentified a new cancer treatment. It is called SAHA, not L.S.D. In addition, the author’s pharmaceutical data points stem only from recreational “lab experimentation,” not from peer-reviewed double-blind studies as stated.

Spectator is committed to accuracy unless it’s inconvenient for us or we find your complaint bitchy.